https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347137 Conviction under the NDPS Act was found unsafe where the prosecution relied mainly on the investigating officer's testimony without corroboration from other raiding officers or independent public witnesses. The non-examination of key witnesses, coupled with the absence of a convincing explanation, weakened the recovery version and created reasonable doubt. The Court also noted that the secret information was not properly recorded and that the surrounding circumstances of the alleged recovery and possession were doubtful. In these circumstances, the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt, and the benefit of doubt resulted in acquittal. en-us Thu, 24 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 30 Aug 2017 07:32:04 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347137 Conviction under the NDPS Act was found unsafe where the prosecution relied mainly on the investigating officer's testimony without corroboration from other raiding officers or independent public witnesses. The non-examination of key witnesses, coupled with the absence of a convincing explanation, weakened the recovery version and created reasonable doubt. The Court also noted that the secret information was not properly recorded and that the surrounding circumstances of the alleged recovery and possession were doubtful. In these circumstances, the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt, and the benefit of doubt resulted in acquittal. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 24 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347137