<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1968 (10) TMI 106 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194123</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court upheld the High Court&#039;s judgment, confirming the appellant&#039;s conviction under Section 5(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act and reducing the sentence. The appellant&#039;s arguments regarding the applicability of the presumption under Section 5(3) after its repeal, compliance with statutory safeguards under Section 5A, and alleged defectiveness of the charge under Section 5(2) were all rejected. The appeal was ultimately dismissed by the Supreme Court.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Oct 1968 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2017 18:22:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=487342" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1968 (10) TMI 106 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194123</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court upheld the High Court&#039;s judgment, confirming the appellant&#039;s conviction under Section 5(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act and reducing the sentence. The appellant&#039;s arguments regarding the applicability of the presumption under Section 5(3) after its repeal, compliance with statutory safeguards under Section 5A, and alleged defectiveness of the charge under Section 5(2) were all rejected. The appeal was ultimately dismissed by the Supreme Court.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Oct 1968 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194123</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>