https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194119 Cheque dishonour conviction was upheld because the promissory note, cheque, reply notice and income-tax returns supported the complainant's loan claim, while the accused failed to prove fabrication or that the cheque was only a security instrument. A default sentence for non-payment of compensation under Section 357(3) CrPC was held valid because compensation must be effective and enforceable, and that enforcement is not confined to recovery as a fine under Section 421; the order restoring imprisonment in default of payment was affirmed. en-us Tue, 03 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 08 Sep 2017 15:35:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194119 Cheque dishonour conviction was upheld because the promissory note, cheque, reply notice and income-tax returns supported the complainant's loan claim, while the accused failed to prove fabrication or that the cheque was only a security instrument. A default sentence for non-payment of compensation under Section 357(3) CrPC was held valid because compensation must be effective and enforceable, and that enforcement is not confined to recovery as a fine under Section 421; the order restoring imprisonment in default of payment was affirmed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 03 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194119