<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (10) TMI 469 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194117</link>
    <description>The Wakf Act is a self-contained code and the power to frame a scheme for management of wakf property is statutorily vested in the Board under Section 32, not in the Tribunal constituted under Section 83. A statutory tribunal cannot assume a function assigned to another authority, so the Tribunal lacked jurisdiction to frame the scheme. The Tribunal also failed to examine the limitation objection, analyse the evidence, and properly address whether the property could be treated as wakf by dedication or long user. The orders of the Tribunal and High Court were set aside and the matter was remitted for fresh consideration in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2024 14:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=487332" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (10) TMI 469 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194117</link>
      <description>The Wakf Act is a self-contained code and the power to frame a scheme for management of wakf property is statutorily vested in the Board under Section 32, not in the Tribunal constituted under Section 83. A statutory tribunal cannot assume a function assigned to another authority, so the Tribunal lacked jurisdiction to frame the scheme. The Tribunal also failed to examine the limitation objection, analyse the evidence, and properly address whether the property could be treated as wakf by dedication or long user. The orders of the Tribunal and High Court were set aside and the matter was remitted for fresh consideration in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194117</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>