https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194115 The High Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the lower appellate court's judgment and restoring the trial court's decision. The court concluded in favor of the plaintiff, emphasizing the principles of adverse possession and rejecting the defendants' claims based on mistaken belief and tenancy. The court highlighted the importance of clear evidence of hostile possession for adverse possession claims and clarified the application of the Limitation Act of 1963 in the case. en-us Fri, 20 Jun 1975 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 29 Aug 2017 16:57:15 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194115 The High Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the lower appellate court's judgment and restoring the trial court's decision. The court concluded in favor of the plaintiff, emphasizing the principles of adverse possession and rejecting the defendants' claims based on mistaken belief and tenancy. The court highlighted the importance of clear evidence of hostile possession for adverse possession claims and clarified the application of the Limitation Act of 1963 in the case. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 20 Jun 1975 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194115