<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (12) TMI 535 - COMPANY LAW BOARD, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194113</link>
    <description>The Extraordinary General Meeting (EOGM) held on 29.11.2004 was deemed invalid by the Board due to improper notice serving. The petitioners, majority shareholders, were reinstated with the right to manage the company. The Board suggested joint management, which the respondents rejected. All interim orders were lifted, and the company&#039;s status quo was restored to pre-EOGM conditions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Dec 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2017 16:31:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=487322" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (12) TMI 535 - COMPANY LAW BOARD, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194113</link>
      <description>The Extraordinary General Meeting (EOGM) held on 29.11.2004 was deemed invalid by the Board due to improper notice serving. The petitioners, majority shareholders, were reinstated with the right to manage the company. The Board suggested joint management, which the respondents rejected. All interim orders were lifted, and the company&#039;s status quo was restored to pre-EOGM conditions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Dec 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194113</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>