https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194112 Civil court jurisdiction under Section 9 CPC remains available unless the Companies Act expressly or by necessary implication bars it. The exclusion is limited to company-specific matters specially entrusted to the Company Court, such as oppression, mismanagement, winding up, transfer of shares, or other statutory remedies. Reliefs based on a memorandum of understanding and alleged breach of contractual commitments were treated as civil and common law claims, with challenges to a board meeting notice and restraint on share transfer regarded as incidental to contractual enforcement. Civil revisions to strike off the plaint and set aside the interlocutory order were therefore not sustainable, and the disputes were maintainable before the ordinary civil court. en-us Fri, 31 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 14 Mar 2018 10:38:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194112 Civil court jurisdiction under Section 9 CPC remains available unless the Companies Act expressly or by necessary implication bars it. The exclusion is limited to company-specific matters specially entrusted to the Company Court, such as oppression, mismanagement, winding up, transfer of shares, or other statutory remedies. Reliefs based on a memorandum of understanding and alleged breach of contractual commitments were treated as civil and common law claims, with challenges to a board meeting notice and restraint on share transfer regarded as incidental to contractual enforcement. Civil revisions to strike off the plaint and set aside the interlocutory order were therefore not sustainable, and the disputes were maintainable before the ordinary civil court. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 31 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194112