https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194105 The High Court affirmed the Trial Court's decision that the complaint was not filed by an authorized person on behalf of the complainant-company, leading to the respondent's acquittal. The Court emphasized the necessity for a company to be represented by a human agency in legal proceedings and found that the general power of attorney did not specifically authorize filing the complaint under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. As a result, the complaint was deemed not maintainable, and the appeal was dismissed, upholding the respondent's acquittal. en-us Fri, 27 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 29 Aug 2017 12:30:05 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194105 The High Court affirmed the Trial Court's decision that the complaint was not filed by an authorized person on behalf of the complainant-company, leading to the respondent's acquittal. The Court emphasized the necessity for a company to be represented by a human agency in legal proceedings and found that the general power of attorney did not specifically authorize filing the complaint under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. As a result, the complaint was deemed not maintainable, and the appeal was dismissed, upholding the respondent's acquittal. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 27 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194105