https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194102 The court ruled in favor of Arham Engineers Pvt. Ltd. in the winding-up petition against Cepham Organics Ltd. The respondent's plea of the petition being time-barred was dismissed as the court interpreted Section 18 of the Limitation Act to determine the starting point of the limitation period from the acknowledgment of liability in writing. Legal precedents were applied to support this interpretation, and as the respondent admitted liability and was found financially insolvent, the court admitted the petition for hearing, ordering publication of citation unless the debt was paid within two months. en-us Wed, 08 Sep 1993 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 29 Aug 2017 12:02:48 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194102 The court ruled in favor of Arham Engineers Pvt. Ltd. in the winding-up petition against Cepham Organics Ltd. The respondent's plea of the petition being time-barred was dismissed as the court interpreted Section 18 of the Limitation Act to determine the starting point of the limitation period from the acknowledgment of liability in writing. Legal precedents were applied to support this interpretation, and as the respondent admitted liability and was found financially insolvent, the court admitted the petition for hearing, ordering publication of citation unless the debt was paid within two months. Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 08 Sep 1993 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194102