<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (3) TMI 791 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194101</link>
    <description>The SC set aside the HC&#039;s judgment, dismissing the writ petitions challenging the tender terms. The SC emphasized the limited scope of judicial review under Article 226 in contractual matters, reinforcing that courts should not alter tender terms unless they are arbitrary or discriminatory. The appeals were accepted, with no costs ordered.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Jun 2024 10:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=487269" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (3) TMI 791 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194101</link>
      <description>The SC set aside the HC&#039;s judgment, dismissing the writ petitions challenging the tender terms. The SC emphasized the limited scope of judicial review under Article 226 in contractual matters, reinforcing that courts should not alter tender terms unless they are arbitrary or discriminatory. The appeals were accepted, with no costs ordered.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194101</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>