<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 1692 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194076</link>
    <description>Inter-unit transfers valued under the Central Excise valuation rules may not attract interest or penalty where the differential duty is voluntarily paid before the show cause notice and the recipient sister unit has already taken Cenvat credit. The stated reasoning is that, in the absence of any dispute over credit availment and without proof of mala fide undervaluation, interest liability does not arise and penalty is not sustainable. The operative legal point is that prompt payment of differential duty, coupled with no dishonest intent, removes the basis for consequential interest and penal action in such clearance disputes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2017 09:40:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=487253" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 1692 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194076</link>
      <description>Inter-unit transfers valued under the Central Excise valuation rules may not attract interest or penalty where the differential duty is voluntarily paid before the show cause notice and the recipient sister unit has already taken Cenvat credit. The stated reasoning is that, in the absence of any dispute over credit availment and without proof of mala fide undervaluation, interest liability does not arise and penalty is not sustainable. The operative legal point is that prompt payment of differential duty, coupled with no dishonest intent, removes the basis for consequential interest and penal action in such clearance disputes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194076</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>