<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (7) TMI 1345 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194090</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the ITAT decision in a tax appeal concerning the interpretation of section 2(22)(e) of the Income Tax Act. The Court affirmed that a deposit received by an assessee company, which did not hold shares in the depositing company, was an intercorporate deposit and not a deemed dividend under the Act. Following established legal principles, the Court dismissed the appeal, finding no distinction in the facts from previous judgments and supporting the correctness of the ITAT&#039;s deletion of the addition made by the Assessing Officer.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2017 09:40:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=487250" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (7) TMI 1345 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194090</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the ITAT decision in a tax appeal concerning the interpretation of section 2(22)(e) of the Income Tax Act. The Court affirmed that a deposit received by an assessee company, which did not hold shares in the depositing company, was an intercorporate deposit and not a deemed dividend under the Act. Following established legal principles, the Court dismissed the appeal, finding no distinction in the facts from previous judgments and supporting the correctness of the ITAT&#039;s deletion of the addition made by the Assessing Officer.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194090</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>