<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 1437 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194092</link>
    <description>The court upheld the Arbitral Tribunal&#039;s decision that the service provided was Charter Hire, not Goods Transport Agency, relieving the claimant of service tax liability. It was determined that ONGC, as the charterer, was responsible for the service tax under the contract terms. The court found the Tribunal&#039;s interpretation reasonable and within its jurisdiction, dismissing the appeal and confirming the single Judge&#039;s order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2018 15:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=487243" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 1437 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194092</link>
      <description>The court upheld the Arbitral Tribunal&#039;s decision that the service provided was Charter Hire, not Goods Transport Agency, relieving the claimant of service tax liability. It was determined that ONGC, as the charterer, was responsible for the service tax under the contract terms. The court found the Tribunal&#039;s interpretation reasonable and within its jurisdiction, dismissing the appeal and confirming the single Judge&#039;s order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194092</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>