<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (7) TMI 1243 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194093</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT MUMBAI, in a judgment by Member (T) P.R. Chandrasekharan, dismissed the appeal of M/s. Kingfisher Airlines Ltd. for non-compliance with pre-deposit orders under the Central Excise Act, 1944, and Finance Act, 1994. The appellant failed to make the required deposit despite extensions and not obtaining interim directions from the High Court. Consequently, the main appellant&#039;s appeal was dismissed, leading to separate hearings for co-appellants&#039; stay petitions. The Tribunal also disposed of the department&#039;s early hearing application, emphasizing the importance of procedural compliance and fair adjudication.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2017 09:40:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=487242" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (7) TMI 1243 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194093</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT MUMBAI, in a judgment by Member (T) P.R. Chandrasekharan, dismissed the appeal of M/s. Kingfisher Airlines Ltd. for non-compliance with pre-deposit orders under the Central Excise Act, 1944, and Finance Act, 1994. The appellant failed to make the required deposit despite extensions and not obtaining interim directions from the High Court. Consequently, the main appellant&#039;s appeal was dismissed, leading to separate hearings for co-appellants&#039; stay petitions. The Tribunal also disposed of the department&#039;s early hearing application, emphasizing the importance of procedural compliance and fair adjudication.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194093</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>