<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 1188 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347130</link>
    <description>The tribunal found that the assessment order passed by the AO under section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act was neither erroneous nor prejudicial to the interest of the revenue. Therefore, the tribunal quashed the CIT&#039;s order under section 263 and restored the original assessment order, allowing the appeal filed by the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2017 17:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=487226" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 1188 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347130</link>
      <description>The tribunal found that the assessment order passed by the AO under section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act was neither erroneous nor prejudicial to the interest of the revenue. Therefore, the tribunal quashed the CIT&#039;s order under section 263 and restored the original assessment order, allowing the appeal filed by the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347130</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>