<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 1184 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347126</link>
    <description>The appeal was partly allowed. The disallowance of interest expense was remanded back to the Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication with specific directions to verify the facts. The disallowance of vehicle expenses was reduced from 20% to 10%, considering the statutory nature of depreciation and the lack of supporting evidence for the claimed expenses.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Aug 2017 20:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=487222" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 1184 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347126</link>
      <description>The appeal was partly allowed. The disallowance of interest expense was remanded back to the Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication with specific directions to verify the facts. The disallowance of vehicle expenses was reduced from 20% to 10%, considering the statutory nature of depreciation and the lack of supporting evidence for the claimed expenses.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347126</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>