<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 1179 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347121</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found in favor of the assessee, holding that the Commissioner of Income Tax (CIT) could not revise the assessment order under Section 263 as the Assessing Officer (A.O) had adequately examined the issues. The Tribunal quashed the CIT&#039;s order, restoring the assessment order passed by the A.O. The Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by the assessee, concluding that the A.O&#039;s decision was neither erroneous nor prejudicial to the interest of the revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Aug 2017 10:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=487217" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 1179 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347121</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found in favor of the assessee, holding that the Commissioner of Income Tax (CIT) could not revise the assessment order under Section 263 as the Assessing Officer (A.O) had adequately examined the issues. The Tribunal quashed the CIT&#039;s order, restoring the assessment order passed by the A.O. The Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by the assessee, concluding that the A.O&#039;s decision was neither erroneous nor prejudicial to the interest of the revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347121</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>