<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 1178 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347120</link>
    <description>The court allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal regarding the denial of Cenvat credit for the mediclaim policy for employees, citing the Group Insurance Health Policy as an eligible input service. However, the denial of Cenvat credit for the Keyman Insurance Policy for the Managing Director was remanded for further examination to determine its eligibility, providing the appellant with an opportunity for a personal hearing and document submission.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2017 07:10:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=487216" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 1178 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347120</link>
      <description>The court allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal regarding the denial of Cenvat credit for the mediclaim policy for employees, citing the Group Insurance Health Policy as an eligible input service. However, the denial of Cenvat credit for the Keyman Insurance Policy for the Managing Director was remanded for further examination to determine its eligibility, providing the appellant with an opportunity for a personal hearing and document submission.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347120</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>