https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347111 Renewal of an FL-11 liquor licence was declined because the licensed premises were found within the prohibited distance from the outer edge of the State Highway and had direct access from the highway. The distance restriction was applied to the premises as a whole, and the argument that only the bar room lay beyond the restricted zone was rejected. The licence also stood in another person's name, and no valid application for transfer or renewal in the second petitioner's name had been made under the Foreign Liquor Rules. In the absence of illegality, arbitrariness, or jurisdictional error, interference with the refusal to renew was not warranted. en-us Mon, 17 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 29 Aug 2017 16:13:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347111 Renewal of an FL-11 liquor licence was declined because the licensed premises were found within the prohibited distance from the outer edge of the State Highway and had direct access from the highway. The distance restriction was applied to the premises as a whole, and the argument that only the bar room lay beyond the restricted zone was rejected. The licence also stood in another person's name, and no valid application for transfer or renewal in the second petitioner's name had been made under the Foreign Liquor Rules. In the absence of illegality, arbitrariness, or jurisdictional error, interference with the refusal to renew was not warranted. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 17 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347111