https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347099 The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, affirming duty demands under Section 11D for the recovery of excess excise duty collected by the oil corporation post-duty revisions for Motor Spirit and High Speed Diesel Oil. The Appellant's argument regarding government pricing control and inclusive pricing was rejected, with the Tribunal finding that the increased prices constituted extra excise duty falling under Section 11D liability. The decision, pronounced on 14.06.2017, upheld the duty demands and required refunding the excess excise duty to the government, along with interest payment. en-us Wed, 14 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 09 Feb 2018 11:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347099 The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, affirming duty demands under Section 11D for the recovery of excess excise duty collected by the oil corporation post-duty revisions for Motor Spirit and High Speed Diesel Oil. The Appellant's argument regarding government pricing control and inclusive pricing was rejected, with the Tribunal finding that the increased prices constituted extra excise duty falling under Section 11D liability. The decision, pronounced on 14.06.2017, upheld the duty demands and required refunding the excess excise duty to the government, along with interest payment. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 14 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347099