https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347095 The Tribunal dismissed the appellant's restoration application after the appeal was dismissed for non-compliance with the pre-deposit order under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The Tribunal emphasized that post-dismissal, it lacked jurisdiction to entertain restoration requests, highlighting the importance of timely compliance with pre-deposit orders to uphold statutory provisions. The appellant's delay in compliance was not condoned, and the Tribunal underscored that deposits made after dismissal do not fulfill pre-deposit requirements. The respondent's opposition was upheld, and the restoration application was deemed meritless. en-us Mon, 29 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 29 Aug 2017 07:08:48 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347095 The Tribunal dismissed the appellant's restoration application after the appeal was dismissed for non-compliance with the pre-deposit order under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The Tribunal emphasized that post-dismissal, it lacked jurisdiction to entertain restoration requests, highlighting the importance of timely compliance with pre-deposit orders to uphold statutory provisions. The appellant's delay in compliance was not condoned, and the Tribunal underscored that deposits made after dismissal do not fulfill pre-deposit requirements. The respondent's opposition was upheld, and the restoration application was deemed meritless. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 29 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347095