<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 1146 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347088</link>
    <description>Blacklisting or debarment that carries serious civil consequences cannot be imposed arbitrarily and must be preceded by fair notice and a reasonable opportunity to be heard. The Madras High Court found the impugned order unsustainable because it was issued without a show-cause notice and without a clear basis for the adverse action. The later finding that the goods were not adulterated further supported setting aside the debarment. The blacklisting order was therefore quashed for breach of natural justice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2017 07:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=487184" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 1146 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347088</link>
      <description>Blacklisting or debarment that carries serious civil consequences cannot be imposed arbitrarily and must be preceded by fair notice and a reasonable opportunity to be heard. The Madras High Court found the impugned order unsustainable because it was issued without a show-cause notice and without a clear basis for the adverse action. The later finding that the goods were not adulterated further supported setting aside the debarment. The blacklisting order was therefore quashed for breach of natural justice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347088</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>