<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 1144 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347086</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, finding the Appellants&#039; claims lacked merit. It held that the nominee directors&#039; actions were compliant with the AoA, the investment structure did not breach FEMA regulations, and the Company Petition was vexatious and frivolous. The appeal was dismissed without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2017 07:07:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=487182" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 1144 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347086</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, finding the Appellants&#039; claims lacked merit. It held that the nominee directors&#039; actions were compliant with the AoA, the investment structure did not breach FEMA regulations, and the Company Petition was vexatious and frivolous. The appeal was dismissed without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347086</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>