<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 1143 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347085</link>
    <description>Signed balance sheets acknowledging outstanding liability extended limitation under section 18 of the Limitation Act, 1963, so the section 7 IBC application was within time. Documentary evidence, including the loan agreement, promissory note and pledge of shares, showed the advance retained the character of a loan and constituted a financial debt, while the alleged takeover arrangement was not substantiated. The absence of a banker&#039;s certificate did not defeat the application because the IBC required evidence of default, which was otherwise produced through loan documents, account statements and balance sheets. The insolvency petition was admitted, with default established and the objections rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2018 12:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=487181" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 1143 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347085</link>
      <description>Signed balance sheets acknowledging outstanding liability extended limitation under section 18 of the Limitation Act, 1963, so the section 7 IBC application was within time. Documentary evidence, including the loan agreement, promissory note and pledge of shares, showed the advance retained the character of a loan and constituted a financial debt, while the alleged takeover arrangement was not substantiated. The absence of a banker&#039;s certificate did not defeat the application because the IBC required evidence of default, which was otherwise produced through loan documents, account statements and balance sheets. The insolvency petition was admitted, with default established and the objections rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347085</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>