<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 1142 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347084</link>
    <description>The Court granted interim relief to the petitioners challenging an impugned Notification inserting Rule 44 A in the Central Goods and Services Rules, 2017, which required the reversal of CENVAT Credit on imported gold dore bars. The Court acknowledged a prima facie case in favor of the petitioners and directed that no coercive steps be taken to recover the credit until the next hearing date scheduled for 25th September 2017.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Nov 2017 17:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=487180" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 1142 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347084</link>
      <description>The Court granted interim relief to the petitioners challenging an impugned Notification inserting Rule 44 A in the Central Goods and Services Rules, 2017, which required the reversal of CENVAT Credit on imported gold dore bars. The Court acknowledged a prima facie case in favor of the petitioners and directed that no coercive steps be taken to recover the credit until the next hearing date scheduled for 25th September 2017.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347084</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>