https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347082 The appeal was allowed by the Tribunal, confirming its maintainability under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act. The appellants' claim of co-ownership and lawful possession of the property was upheld, with the Tribunal setting aside the confirmation order to the extent of their interest. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of complying with statutory provisions, principles of natural justice, and fair hearing. It directed the Adjudicating Authority to issue notice to the appellants and conduct a fresh adjudication. Possession of the disputed portion was ordered to be restored to the appellants, pending further proceedings. en-us Fri, 17 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 29 Aug 2017 07:01:29 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347082 The appeal was allowed by the Tribunal, confirming its maintainability under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act. The appellants' claim of co-ownership and lawful possession of the property was upheld, with the Tribunal setting aside the confirmation order to the extent of their interest. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of complying with statutory provisions, principles of natural justice, and fair hearing. It directed the Adjudicating Authority to issue notice to the appellants and conduct a fresh adjudication. Possession of the disputed portion was ordered to be restored to the appellants, pending further proceedings. Case-Laws Money Laundering Fri, 17 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347082