<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1952 (10) TMI 46 - NAGPUR HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194073</link>
    <description>The High Court affirmed its broad powers under Articles 226 and 227, clarifying that it can issue any necessary writ, order, or direction beyond quashing orders. The Court emphasized its authority to substitute decisions of subordinate tribunals and issue consequential orders for effective enforcement. In a case involving a landlord&#039;s application to terminate a tenancy, the Court quashed lower orders and granted permission itself, highlighting its power to issue such consequential orders under Article 226. The judgment underscored interpreting the Constitution to provide effective remedies for rights enforcement.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 1952 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Aug 2017 18:34:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=487167" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1952 (10) TMI 46 - NAGPUR HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194073</link>
      <description>The High Court affirmed its broad powers under Articles 226 and 227, clarifying that it can issue any necessary writ, order, or direction beyond quashing orders. The Court emphasized its authority to substitute decisions of subordinate tribunals and issue consequential orders for effective enforcement. In a case involving a landlord&#039;s application to terminate a tenancy, the Court quashed lower orders and granted permission itself, highlighting its power to issue such consequential orders under Article 226. The judgment underscored interpreting the Constitution to provide effective remedies for rights enforcement.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 1952 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194073</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>