https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194072 The Supreme Court declined to interfere with the Bombay High Court's decision to dismiss the Writ Petition as belated. The Court emphasized the principle of delay/laches and considered the continuous representations made by the appellant, ultimately ruling that the delay in filing the petition was not justified. The Court highlighted the importance of timely legal actions, especially in cases involving the utilization of land for industrial development, and upheld the High Court's judgment based on the specific circumstances of the case. en-us Wed, 28 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 28 Aug 2017 17:19:12 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194072 The Supreme Court declined to interfere with the Bombay High Court's decision to dismiss the Writ Petition as belated. The Court emphasized the principle of delay/laches and considered the continuous representations made by the appellant, ultimately ruling that the delay in filing the petition was not justified. The Court highlighted the importance of timely legal actions, especially in cases involving the utilization of land for industrial development, and upheld the High Court's judgment based on the specific circumstances of the case. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 28 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194072