<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (2) TMI 103 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9694</link>
    <description>The High Court of Madras ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the reopening of assessments without issuing notice under section 143(2) within 12 months was not valid. The court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, stating there was no substantial question of law arising from the Appellate Tribunal&#039;s order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 12:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=48716" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (2) TMI 103 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9694</link>
      <description>The High Court of Madras ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the reopening of assessments without issuing notice under section 143(2) within 12 months was not valid. The court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, stating there was no substantial question of law arising from the Appellate Tribunal&#039;s order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9694</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>