<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (1) TMI 27 - RAJASTHAN High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9693</link>
    <description>The High Court of Rajasthan ruled in a case involving the interpretation of section 43B of the Income-tax Act, 1961 regarding the deductibility of &#039;issue price&#039; charged by the Excise Department. The court held that &#039;issue price&#039; was not akin to tax or duty and therefore not covered by section 43B. Additionally, the court clarified that liabilities accrued under contracts do not become contingent due to pending litigation and rejected the Revenue&#039;s application, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 12:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=48715" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (1) TMI 27 - RAJASTHAN High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9693</link>
      <description>The High Court of Rajasthan ruled in a case involving the interpretation of section 43B of the Income-tax Act, 1961 regarding the deductibility of &#039;issue price&#039; charged by the Excise Department. The court held that &#039;issue price&#039; was not akin to tax or duty and therefore not covered by section 43B. Additionally, the court clarified that liabilities accrued under contracts do not become contingent due to pending litigation and rejected the Revenue&#039;s application, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9693</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>