https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194067 Withdrawal of a Special Public Prosecutor's appointment was invalid where the State had consulted the Chief Justice, acted on the appointment for months, and later sought revocation without a legally sustainable basis; the Court treated the abrupt change of stance as mala fides in law and quashed the withdrawal. On the question of extending a Special Judge's tenure, the Court held that it would not bypass the prescribed statutory and constitutional procedure by exercising extraordinary power directly. The matter was left to the High Court and the State Government to consider administratively in accordance with the applicable service rules and required consultation. en-us Mon, 30 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 11 Jan 2023 18:25:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194067 Withdrawal of a Special Public Prosecutor's appointment was invalid where the State had consulted the Chief Justice, acted on the appointment for months, and later sought revocation without a legally sustainable basis; the Court treated the abrupt change of stance as mala fides in law and quashed the withdrawal. On the question of extending a Special Judge's tenure, the Court held that it would not bypass the prescribed statutory and constitutional procedure by exercising extraordinary power directly. The matter was left to the High Court and the State Government to consider administratively in accordance with the applicable service rules and required consultation. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 30 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194067