<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (9) TMI 1182 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194067</link>
    <description>The court quashed the removal of the Special Public Prosecutor, finding it politically motivated and lacking legal basis. Emphasizing the right to a speedy trial, the court highlighted the importance of an uninterrupted judicial process. The request to extend the Special Judge&#039;s tenure was referred to the High Court for administrative review to ensure the trial&#039;s timely conclusion. The writ petitions were disposed of with these decisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2023 18:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=487147" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (9) TMI 1182 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194067</link>
      <description>The court quashed the removal of the Special Public Prosecutor, finding it politically motivated and lacking legal basis. Emphasizing the right to a speedy trial, the court highlighted the importance of an uninterrupted judicial process. The request to extend the Special Judge&#039;s tenure was referred to the High Court for administrative review to ensure the trial&#039;s timely conclusion. The writ petitions were disposed of with these decisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194067</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>