<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 1129 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347071</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the validity of the order under Section 147/143(3) of the Income Tax Act, rejected the Assessee&#039;s claim that the property transfer was a gift instead of a sale, and affirmed the computation of Long Term Capital Gains under Section 50C. The Assessee&#039;s appeal was dismissed, and the order of the CIT(A) was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Aug 2017 18:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=487109" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 1129 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347071</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the validity of the order under Section 147/143(3) of the Income Tax Act, rejected the Assessee&#039;s claim that the property transfer was a gift instead of a sale, and affirmed the computation of Long Term Capital Gains under Section 50C. The Assessee&#039;s appeal was dismissed, and the order of the CIT(A) was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347071</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>