<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (2) TMI 101 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9688</link>
    <description>The High Court of MADRAS upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, affirming the entitlement of the assessee to deduction under section 80HH and recognizing the thrashing and redrying of tobacco leaves as a manufacturing activity resulting in commercially distinct commodities. The court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, finding no error in the Tribunal&#039;s ruling that the transformation of raw tobacco into Virginia flue-cured tobacco lamina and stems constituted manufacturing for the purposes of claiming the deduction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 11:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=48710" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (2) TMI 101 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9688</link>
      <description>The High Court of MADRAS upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, affirming the entitlement of the assessee to deduction under section 80HH and recognizing the thrashing and redrying of tobacco leaves as a manufacturing activity resulting in commercially distinct commodities. The court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, finding no error in the Tribunal&#039;s ruling that the transformation of raw tobacco into Virginia flue-cured tobacco lamina and stems constituted manufacturing for the purposes of claiming the deduction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9688</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>