https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347061 The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, stating that the appellant failed to provide sufficient evidence to substantiate the refund claim for service tax paid erroneously under Goods Transport Agency services. The Tribunal emphasized the need for clear and easily decipherable documentation to support refund claims, noting that the appellant's evidence was not adequately substantiated. Despite the appellant's argument that the tax was paid under protest, the Tribunal found no coercion from the department and concluded that the legal claim was not sufficiently supported by evidence. en-us Tue, 08 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 31 Aug 2018 15:33:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347061 The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, stating that the appellant failed to provide sufficient evidence to substantiate the refund claim for service tax paid erroneously under Goods Transport Agency services. The Tribunal emphasized the need for clear and easily decipherable documentation to support refund claims, noting that the appellant's evidence was not adequately substantiated. Despite the appellant's argument that the tax was paid under protest, the Tribunal found no coercion from the department and concluded that the legal claim was not sufficiently supported by evidence. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 08 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347061