<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 1110 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347052</link>
    <description>Cenvat credit on goods transport service used for carriage from the place of removal to the customer&#039;s premises was in issue, together with whether the CBEC circular could be applied without further factual inquiry. The Bombay HC set aside the tribunal order and remanded the matter to the Assessing Officer for fresh examination, leaving the substantive entitlement question open.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Aug 2017 10:00:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=487090" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 1110 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347052</link>
      <description>Cenvat credit on goods transport service used for carriage from the place of removal to the customer&#039;s premises was in issue, together with whether the CBEC circular could be applied without further factual inquiry. The Bombay HC set aside the tribunal order and remanded the matter to the Assessing Officer for fresh examination, leaving the substantive entitlement question open.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347052</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>