https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347046 The Tribunal held that the appellant's statement was inadmissible as evidence due to non-compliance with procedural requirements, supported by legal precedents and judicial pronouncements from the Hon'ble Punjab & Haryana High Court. Additionally, the evidence presented by the Revenue was insufficient to prove clandestine removal, as it did not follow prescribed procedures and lacked corroborative evidence. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, the impugned order was set aside, and the charge of clandestine removal against the appellant was deemed unproven. en-us Wed, 16 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 21 Sep 2017 11:33:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347046 The Tribunal held that the appellant's statement was inadmissible as evidence due to non-compliance with procedural requirements, supported by legal precedents and judicial pronouncements from the Hon'ble Punjab & Haryana High Court. Additionally, the evidence presented by the Revenue was insufficient to prove clandestine removal, as it did not follow prescribed procedures and lacked corroborative evidence. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, the impugned order was set aside, and the charge of clandestine removal against the appellant was deemed unproven. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 16 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347046