<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 1101 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347043</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals by way of remand due to the adjudicating authority&#039;s failure to follow the principles of natural justice. The matter was directed to be remanded for a fresh order after conducting cross-examination of witnesses. An adjournment request for one of the appeals was also granted, and the original adjudicating authority was instructed to pass a denovo adjudication order within four months from the date of the Tribunal&#039;s order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Aug 2017 09:59:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=487081" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 1101 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347043</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals by way of remand due to the adjudicating authority&#039;s failure to follow the principles of natural justice. The matter was directed to be remanded for a fresh order after conducting cross-examination of witnesses. An adjournment request for one of the appeals was also granted, and the original adjudicating authority was instructed to pass a denovo adjudication order within four months from the date of the Tribunal&#039;s order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347043</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>