https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347040 The court ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing the Cenvat credit on CHA service for the export of goods. The judge determined that the place of removal extended to the port of export based on evidence such as the purchase order and export documents. As the CHA service was utilized for the export process, it was considered an admissible input service. The judge distinguished this case from previous judgments cited by the respondent, as there was no dispute regarding the place of removal being the port of export. Consequently, the appeal was successful, and the impugned order denying the credit was set aside. en-us Mon, 22 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 28 Aug 2017 09:59:20 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347040 The court ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing the Cenvat credit on CHA service for the export of goods. The judge determined that the place of removal extended to the port of export based on evidence such as the purchase order and export documents. As the CHA service was utilized for the export process, it was considered an admissible input service. The judge distinguished this case from previous judgments cited by the respondent, as there was no dispute regarding the place of removal being the port of export. Consequently, the appeal was successful, and the impugned order denying the credit was set aside. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 22 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347040