https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347034 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, determining that they are entitled to pay duty under the normal scheme based on actual production rather than the compounded levy scheme. The decision emphasized the importance of specific declaration and procedural compliance for opting for the compounded levy scheme under Rule 96ZP of the Central Excise Rules. The Tribunal directed the Adjudicating Authority to calculate duty based on actual production and make necessary adjustments, highlighting the significance of adhering to prescribed procedures in such matters. en-us Tue, 10 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 09 Feb 2018 11:10:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347034 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, determining that they are entitled to pay duty under the normal scheme based on actual production rather than the compounded levy scheme. The decision emphasized the importance of specific declaration and procedural compliance for opting for the compounded levy scheme under Rule 96ZP of the Central Excise Rules. The Tribunal directed the Adjudicating Authority to calculate duty based on actual production and make necessary adjustments, highlighting the significance of adhering to prescribed procedures in such matters. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 10 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347034