<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 1085 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347027</link>
    <description>The Tribunal addressed jurisdictional issues under the Customs Act, 1962, considering conflicting decisions among High Courts regarding the authority of officers to issue notices. In light of Supreme Court decisions, the matter was remanded to the original adjudicating authority to first determine jurisdiction. The Tribunal aimed to maintain status quo pending the Supreme Court&#039;s decision, providing an opportunity for the assessee to be heard.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Aug 2017 09:57:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=487065" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 1085 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347027</link>
      <description>The Tribunal addressed jurisdictional issues under the Customs Act, 1962, considering conflicting decisions among High Courts regarding the authority of officers to issue notices. In light of Supreme Court decisions, the matter was remanded to the original adjudicating authority to first determine jurisdiction. The Tribunal aimed to maintain status quo pending the Supreme Court&#039;s decision, providing an opportunity for the assessee to be heard.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347027</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>