<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 1083 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347025</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal partially by reducing fines and penalties imposed on importers. The declared value, supported by the original Chartered Engineer certificate, was upheld, rejecting the local assessment. The confiscation of imported goods over ten years old was deemed valid under the Customs Act. The Tribunal reduced the redemption fine to Rs. 60,000 and penalty to Rs. 30,000, considering the circumstances.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Aug 2017 09:57:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=487063" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 1083 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347025</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal partially by reducing fines and penalties imposed on importers. The declared value, supported by the original Chartered Engineer certificate, was upheld, rejecting the local assessment. The confiscation of imported goods over ten years old was deemed valid under the Customs Act. The Tribunal reduced the redemption fine to Rs. 60,000 and penalty to Rs. 30,000, considering the circumstances.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347025</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>