https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347020 The High Court upheld the lower Appellate Court's decision to acquit the respondent in a case involving a disputed debt represented by a dishonored cheque. The appellant's inconsistent statements and lack of evidence led to the rejection of her claim, with the court finding no legally enforceable debt established. The respondent successfully rebutted statutory presumptions under the Negotiable Instruments Act by highlighting inconsistencies in the appellant's case. The High Court affirmed the lower court's judgment, dismissing the appeal due to insufficient proof of the debt and supporting evidence. en-us Tue, 22 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 28 Aug 2017 09:57:18 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347020 The High Court upheld the lower Appellate Court's decision to acquit the respondent in a case involving a disputed debt represented by a dishonored cheque. The appellant's inconsistent statements and lack of evidence led to the rejection of her claim, with the court finding no legally enforceable debt established. The respondent successfully rebutted statutory presumptions under the Negotiable Instruments Act by highlighting inconsistencies in the appellant's case. The High Court affirmed the lower court's judgment, dismissing the appeal due to insufficient proof of the debt and supporting evidence. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 22 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347020