https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347019 The defendant's plea for leave to defend in the summary suit was assessed against the written agreement, which recorded the loan liability, repayment obligation and the effect of dishonoured cheques. The alleged later compromise in a separate company dispute was treated as unrelated to the suit transaction, and the claimed oral understanding could not vary or contradict the written terms. Although the defence was not found wholly illusory, it was not accepted as a complete answer to the claim. Leave to defend was therefore granted only on condition of deposit of the principal amount within four weeks. en-us Thu, 10 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 28 Aug 2017 09:57:15 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347019 The defendant's plea for leave to defend in the summary suit was assessed against the written agreement, which recorded the loan liability, repayment obligation and the effect of dishonoured cheques. The alleged later compromise in a separate company dispute was treated as unrelated to the suit transaction, and the claimed oral understanding could not vary or contradict the written terms. Although the defence was not found wholly illusory, it was not accepted as a complete answer to the claim. Leave to defend was therefore granted only on condition of deposit of the principal amount within four weeks. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 10 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347019