https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194057 Revenue and settlement records showing a party as pattadar and khatadar can support correction of the record of rights, declaration of title and injunction unless the State proves lawful confiscation, vesting or other valid proceedings. Later unilateral entries describing the land as Government land, or a duplicated survey number, do not by themselves displace the original title record. On procedure, non-substitution of one deceased respondent did not cause total abatement because the surviving sharers could represent the distinct rights involved, and the reference to a third Judge was valid under the applicable chartered court procedure. The limitation and estoppel objections also failed. en-us Fri, 09 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 28 Aug 2017 09:56:26 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194057 Revenue and settlement records showing a party as pattadar and khatadar can support correction of the record of rights, declaration of title and injunction unless the State proves lawful confiscation, vesting or other valid proceedings. Later unilateral entries describing the land as Government land, or a duplicated survey number, do not by themselves displace the original title record. On procedure, non-substitution of one deceased respondent did not cause total abatement because the surviving sharers could represent the distinct rights involved, and the reference to a third Judge was valid under the applicable chartered court procedure. The limitation and estoppel objections also failed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 09 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194057