<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (3) TMI 1057 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194047</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court determined that the Uttar Pradesh Ganna Kishan Sansthan qualifies as a &#039;State&#039; under Article 12 of the Constitution of India. The Sansthan, established to take over functions related to cane-growing, was found to be financially, functionally, and administratively controlled by the government. The Court applied various tests and precedents to reach this conclusion, including examining the entity&#039;s formation, management, and financial support. As a result, the respondent&#039;s appeal challenging the abolition of his post and termination of services was dismissed, with costs assessed at Rs. 50,000.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Aug 2017 12:42:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=487018" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (3) TMI 1057 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194047</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court determined that the Uttar Pradesh Ganna Kishan Sansthan qualifies as a &#039;State&#039; under Article 12 of the Constitution of India. The Sansthan, established to take over functions related to cane-growing, was found to be financially, functionally, and administratively controlled by the government. The Court applied various tests and precedents to reach this conclusion, including examining the entity&#039;s formation, management, and financial support. As a result, the respondent&#039;s appeal challenging the abolition of his post and termination of services was dismissed, with costs assessed at Rs. 50,000.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194047</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>