https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194046 The 1999 amendment to Section 115 CPC was treated as a deliberate restriction on revisional jurisdiction: a High Court may interfere with an interlocutory order only if, had the order gone the applicant's way, it would have finally disposed of the suit or other proceeding. The expression "other proceeding" was held not to include interlocutory or supplemental steps within a suit. The Court also held that inherent powers cannot be used to bypass this express statutory bar. However, a revision under Section 115 may be converted into a petition under Article 227 in an appropriate case, and such conversion was permitted here. en-us Wed, 05 Feb 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 26 Aug 2017 12:35:08 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194046 The 1999 amendment to Section 115 CPC was treated as a deliberate restriction on revisional jurisdiction: a High Court may interfere with an interlocutory order only if, had the order gone the applicant's way, it would have finally disposed of the suit or other proceeding. The expression "other proceeding" was held not to include interlocutory or supplemental steps within a suit. The Court also held that inherent powers cannot be used to bypass this express statutory bar. However, a revision under Section 115 may be converted into a petition under Article 227 in an appropriate case, and such conversion was permitted here. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 05 Feb 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194046