<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (3) TMI 752 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194045</link>
    <description>The petition was dismissed, but the Court granted the petitioner six weeks to file a reply to the show cause notice dated 4-11-2008. It also directed the Adjudicating Authority to consider the matter and pass a decision expeditiously, with an outer limit of four months from the date of the order. The merits were left for determination by the Adjudicating Authority after receipt of the reply, and the order was framed to ensure prompt adjudication rather than substantive relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Aug 2017 11:47:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=487006" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (3) TMI 752 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194045</link>
      <description>The petition was dismissed, but the Court granted the petitioner six weeks to file a reply to the show cause notice dated 4-11-2008. It also directed the Adjudicating Authority to consider the matter and pass a decision expeditiously, with an outer limit of four months from the date of the order. The merits were left for determination by the Adjudicating Authority after receipt of the reply, and the order was framed to ensure prompt adjudication rather than substantive relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194045</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>