https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194041 The Civil Revision Petition was dismissed, affirming the lower court's order. The court rejected the request for transposition of the 7th defendant as the third plaintiff, citing legal principles, the 7th defendant's agreement with the court's decision, and the need to comply with the High Court's directive to dispose of the suit within six months. The court emphasized the potential legal uncertainties if the second plaintiff reappeared and stressed adherence to the Division Bench's time frame directive. Consequently, C.M.P.No.6429 of 2004 was also dismissed, with no costs ordered. en-us Thu, 22 Jul 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 26 Aug 2017 11:19:08 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194041 The Civil Revision Petition was dismissed, affirming the lower court's order. The court rejected the request for transposition of the 7th defendant as the third plaintiff, citing legal principles, the 7th defendant's agreement with the court's decision, and the need to comply with the High Court's directive to dispose of the suit within six months. The court emphasized the potential legal uncertainties if the second plaintiff reappeared and stressed adherence to the Division Bench's time frame directive. Consequently, C.M.P.No.6429 of 2004 was also dismissed, with no costs ordered. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 22 Jul 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194041