<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (1) TMI 25 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9677</link>
    <description>The High Court set aside the impugned order and remanded the case to the Tribunal for a fresh decision on both issues concerning the interpretation of section 80M of the Income-tax Act and the allowance claimed under section 32AB. The Court emphasized the importance of providing detailed reasoning in judicial decisions for effective appellate review and legal sustainability.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Jan 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 19:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=48699" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (1) TMI 25 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9677</link>
      <description>The High Court set aside the impugned order and remanded the case to the Tribunal for a fresh decision on both issues concerning the interpretation of section 80M of the Income-tax Act and the allowance claimed under section 32AB. The Court emphasized the importance of providing detailed reasoning in judicial decisions for effective appellate review and legal sustainability.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Jan 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9677</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>