<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (7) TMI 1342 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194024</link>
    <description>The court held that Western Coal Fields (WCL) could recover the additional Central Excise duty from the petitioners, including &quot;Royalty&quot; and &quot;Stowing Excise Duty&quot; components in the transaction value. It found that WCL&#039;s actions were lawful, following directives from Coal India Ltd. and the Excise Department. The court dismissed the writ petitions, emphasizing the need to safeguard public revenue and stating that if the Supreme Court ruled in favor of the petitioners, they could seek a refund through appropriate legal channels. The court upheld the validity of WCL&#039;s actions and continued interim orders for eight weeks for potential further relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Aug 2017 10:20:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=486978" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (7) TMI 1342 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194024</link>
      <description>The court held that Western Coal Fields (WCL) could recover the additional Central Excise duty from the petitioners, including &quot;Royalty&quot; and &quot;Stowing Excise Duty&quot; components in the transaction value. It found that WCL&#039;s actions were lawful, following directives from Coal India Ltd. and the Excise Department. The court dismissed the writ petitions, emphasizing the need to safeguard public revenue and stating that if the Supreme Court ruled in favor of the petitioners, they could seek a refund through appropriate legal channels. The court upheld the validity of WCL&#039;s actions and continued interim orders for eight weeks for potential further relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194024</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>